Attention-based Clinical Note Summarization

In recent years, the trend of deploying digital systems in numerous industries has hiked. The health sector has observed an extensive adoption of digital systems and services that generate significant medical records. Electronic health records contain valuable information for prospective and retrospective analysis that is often not entirely exploited because of the complicated dense information storage. The crude purpose of condensing health records is to select the information that holds most characteristics of the original documents based on a reported disease. These summaries may boost diagnosis and save a doctor's time during a saturated workload situation like the COVID-19 pandemic. In this paper, we are applying a multi-head attention-based mechanism to perform extractive summarization of meaningful phrases on clinical notes. Our method finds major sentences for a summary by correlating tokens, segments, and positional embeddings of sentences in a clinical note. The model outputs attention scores that are statistically transformed to extract critical phrases for visualization on the heat-mapping tool and for human use.

Radiologic and Endoscopic Treatment for a Disconnected Pancreatic Duct Syndrome Associated to Percutaneous Pancreatic Fistula: Achieving the "Internalization of the Fistula"

Background and aim: A 40-year-old male was referred to our institute for the management of a percutaneous pancreatic fistula after acute pancreatitis due to SARS-COV2 infection. He developed a peripancreatic collection(PPC) which was percutaneously drained due to infection. After the resolution of PPC, a percutaneous leakage of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) was observed, so he underwent Endoscopic Retrograde ColangioPancreatography(ERCP) with biliary plus pancreatic sphincterotomy and placement of both pancreatic and biliary stent without resolution of the leak. Material(s) and Method(s): Then he was referred to our institution, where initial management included ERCP with placement of two trans-papillary pancreatic stents and the removal of percutaneous catheter, but the fistula kept to drain. Result(s): A multidisciplinary-board decided to perform a rendezvous with interventional radiology to facilitate an endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) trans-gastric drainage of the pancreatic area draining in the percutaneous fistula. Conclusion(s): The procedure included an initial ERCP with replacement of the two pancreatic stents while the radiologist places percutaneously a guidewire through the fistula to the pancreatic point of leakage into MPD. After that, EUS identified the point in which the percutaneous guidewire was getting into the MPD and a trans-gastric EUS-guided insertion of a guidewire achieved the MPD through a 19-Gauge needle. The latter guidewire crossed the percutaneous fistula and came out. At that point, a dilation up to 10 mm was performed to create a trans-gastric pancreatic fistula. The next step was to insert percutaneously a double pigtail(10 Fr) releasing the distal side into the stomach and the proximal side into the main pancreatic duct in order to stabilize the neo-fistula. Another trans-gastric plastic stent was endoscopically placed through the pancreato-gastric neo-fistula. At the end, injection of contrast dye through the percutaneous fistula showed a complete drainage into stomach. In conclusion, the procedure achieved the complete exclusion and resolution of the pancreatic-cutaneous fistula.Copyright © 2023. Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l.

Lack of seroconversion following COVID-19 vaccination, but not treatment, is an independent risk factor for breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Data from ESCAPE -an IG-IBD Study

Background: As patients with immune conditions were excluded from COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, it is important to accumulate realworld data in this setting, particularly to identify those who would benefit from repeated doses. Method(s): Effectiveness and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccine in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Treated with Immunomodulatory or Biological Drugs (ESCAPE) is a prospective, multicentre, observational study assessing effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with IBD (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04769258). Here we present data on the rate of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections in the timeframe between 14 days after the second dose and the third dose of COVID-19 vaccine (or a maximum of 9 months from the second dose). The risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection, including lack of seroconversion (cut-off for IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2: OD 0.28) and IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 levels after 8 weeks from the second dose, and treatment for IBD, were assessed. Result(s): Out of the 1076 patients with IBD enrolled in the ESCAPE study, data on breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection were available in 953 cases. Most of the patients received homologous, doubledose mRNA-based vaccines (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273: 99.2%). Seroconversion was reported in 92.7% of cases (median OD 1.60 [IQR 0.8-3.6]), while SARS-CoV-2 infection was documented in 95 patients (10.0%), of whom 9 died. At multivariable regression analyses, age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.99;p<0.001) being former smoker (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.26-3.88;p=0.005), and lack of seroconversion (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.99;p=0.034) were independent predictors of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conversely, none of the treatments for IBD was associated with breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection. Notably, all 9 patients who died had reported seroconversion after the second dose. Conclusion(s): IBD patients without seroconversion after COVID-19 vaccines are at increased risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection, while medications for IBD had no impac.

Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on a statewide breast and cervical cancer safety net screening and diagnostic program: Are there differences by rural - urban geography?

Background: COVID-19 disrupted the healthcare system and services across the cancer continuum. Early on, breast and cervical (B & C) screenings were effectively halted, and many diagnostic and treatment procedures delayed. Emerging evidence suggests that uninsured populations and patients of color were disproportionately affected, but less is known about ruralurban differences. The Illinois Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Program (IBCCP), administered by agencies across 102 counties, provides screening and diagnostic services for lowincome, uninsured, and underinsured persons. This study assesses the impact of COVID-19 on agencies' administrative functions and clients' ability to receive services, and to examine rural-urban differences. Method(s): IBCCP coordinators were invited to complete an online survey that asked about COVID-19's effect on administrative functions and services at two different time periods, the height of the pandemic and in the past month (11/2021-12/2021). Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to examine differences between rural and urban agencies (classified by using the 2013 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme). Result(s): In total, 32 agencies (50% urban, 50% rural), responded. Concerning administrative functions, in the past month compared to at the height of the pandemic, fewer agencies overall reported that COVID-19 had a moderate to great impact (compared to occasional or no impact) on staffing (47% vs. 74%) and client enrollment (34% vs. 90%). Although not significant, more rural than urban agencies reported effects on staffing (56% vs. 38%) and enrollment (50% vs. 19%) in the past month. Concerning clients' ability to receive services, in the past month compared to the height of the pandemic, fewer agencies overall reported COVID-19 effects on screening (31% vs. 75%), diagnostic (19% vs. 61%), and treatment (3% vs. 38%) services. Some rural-urban differences were noted;at the height of the pandemic, urban agencies were more likely to report effects on diagnostic (88% vs. 33%, p=.002) and treatment (56% vs. 19%, p=.028) services when compared to rural. Although not significant, in the past month, more urban (vs. rural) agencies reported COVID-19 related effects on screening (44% vs. 19%), diagnostic (31% vs. 6%), and treatment (7% vs. 0%) services. Conclusion(s): Overall, agencies implementing this safety net program are generally rebounding from the pandemic's effect on administrative functions and clients' ability to receive services. However, rural and urban agencies may be differentially affected by the pandemic. For example, in the past month, a greater proportion of rural agencies reported effects on administrative functions Interestingly, more urban agencies reported lingering effects on clients' ability to receive screening and diagnostic services. These trends suggest that rural and urban agencies may be differentially affected by the pandemic and geographically tailored responses may best support recovery.

Safety of Covid-19 Vaccine in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Data of a National Study (Escape-Ibd)

Introduction: Vaccination is the most effective method to prevent and control the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Recommendations consider patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), a high-priority population to COVID-19 vaccine administration. There were a lot of concerns about vaccination safety in the setting of biological and immunomodulatory drugs. The purpose of this study was to present data on safety about anti-SARSCoV- 2 vaccination in a cohort of IBD patients. These are data of an ongoing multicenter study assessing effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with IBD treated with immunomodulatory or biological drugs (ESCAPE-IBD) sponsored by the Italian Group for the study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD - ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04769258). Aims & Methods: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was administrated to 809 IBD patients. Afterwards completed vaccination, telephone or in-person interviews were conducted from February to July 2021 by gastroenterologists from referral center to report local and/or systemic adverse events (AEs) related to vaccination. Data on medical history and treatment was collected from electronic health records. Of these 809, 346 patients were surveyed on the pandemic burden and the main reason for hesitancy in Covid-19 vaccination. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between disease-related characteristics and the onset of AEs. Result(s): 809 patients, 456 CD and 353 UC, regularly followed in IBD unit, were enrolled. All patients received a complete SARS-CoV-2 vaccination cycle. Most of them (68%) were in biological or immunomodulatory therapy. About 45% of patients had at least one side effect, following the first dose (10%), the second (15%) or both doses (20%). Local pain at site of injection (24%), fatigue (33%) and fever (30%) were the three most common AEs. Flares of the underlying IBD were not reported. The vast majority of AE were mild and lasted only a few days. No serious AEs were reported and no patient was hospitalized. Logistic regression analysis revealed that female gender (p<0.001), younger age (p=0.001), seroconversion (p=0.002) and comorbidity (p<0.001) were significantly associated with the occurrence of AEs. Futhermore the survey showed that the pandemic did not affect IBD at all in 37.5%, and a lot in 9.2% of participants. The majority (95%) of patients welcomed the possibility of getting vaccinated;only 7% feared the vaccine's influence on the course of the IBD. The main concerns were the possibility of adverse effects (33%) and the failure to achieve immunity (17%), few for the type of vaccine (3%) and for the need to a further booster (6%). Almost all patients (99%) felt safer to have vaccinated at their IBD reference center. Conclusion(s): The short-term vaccine reactions experienced in this cohort of IBD patients were mostly self-limiting, including local pain at the injection site, fatigue and fever. We found a high acceptance rate and a good safety profile of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in our cohort.

Reduced Humoral Response to Two Doses of Covid-19 Vaccine in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Data from Escape-Ibd, an Ig-Ibd Study

Introduction: Patients on immunosuppressive drugs have been excluded from COVID-19 vaccines trials, creating concerns regarding their efficacy in this setting. Aims & Methods: Effectiveness and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccine in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Treated with Immunomodulatory or Biological Drugs (ESCAPE-IBD) is a prospective, multicentre study promoted by the Italian Group for the study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. We present data on serological response eight weeks after the second dose of COVID-19 vaccination in IBD patients and healthy controls (HCs). Result(s): 1076 patients with IBD and 1126 HCs were analyzed. Seropositivity for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was reported for most IBD patients, even if with a lesser rate compared with HCs (92.1% vs. 97.9%;p<0.001). HCs had higher antibody concentrations (median OD 8.72 [IQR 5.2-14-2]) compared to the whole cohort of IBD patients (median OD 1.54 [IQR 0.8-3.6];p<0.001) and the subgroup of IBD patients (n=280) without any treatment or on aminosalicylates only (median OD 1.72 [IQR 1.0-4.1];p<0.001). IBD patients treated with anti-TNFs showed significantly lower median anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels compared with those without any treatment or on aminosalicylates only (OD 1.30 [IQR 0.7-3.0] vs.1.72 [IQR 1.0-4.1];p<0.001), those treated with Vedolizumab (OD 1.78 [IQR 1.1-4.1];p=0.001), and Ustekinumab (OD 1.71 [IQR 0.9-4.9];p=0.03). Conclusion(s): Although most IBD patients showed seropositivity after two doses of COVID-19 vaccines, the magnitude of the humoral response was significantly lower than in HCs. Differently from other studies, these findings seem to be mostly unrelated to the use of immune-modifying treatments. Regarding COVID-19 vaccination, patients with IBD should be regarded as a whole as a "frail" category, therefore requiring booster/additional doses of COVID-19 vaccine.

Clinical assessment of the Omicron outbreak in Europe and trends in morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 and cancer

Background: Whilst patients (pts) with cancer are at increased risk of adverse outcome from Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), no evidence exists as to the natural history of the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant in this population. Methods: Capitalizing on OnCovid study data (NCT04393974), a European registry that collects data on consecutive patients with cancer and COVID-19, we analysed COVID-19 morbidity and case fatality rates at 14 days (CFR14) across 3 phases defined following the evolution of the pandemic in Europe, according to date of COVID-19 diagnosis: “Pre-vaccination” phase (27/02/2020-30/ 11/2020), “Alpha-Delta variant” phase (01/12/2020-14/12/2021), “Omicron variant” phase (15/12/2020-31/01/2022). Results: By the data lock of 04/02/2022, 3820 consecutive pts were enrolled, 3473 of whom were eligible for this analysis. Among them, 2033 (58.6%), 1075 (30.9%) and 365 (10.5%) were diagnosed during the Pre-vaccination, Alpha-Delta and Omicron phases. Pts diagnosed in the Omicron phase were more likely aged < 65 years (48.6% vs 42.5%, 39.4% p = 0.01), had < 2 comorbidities (61.9% vs 55.6%, 52.1% p = 0.01). They had more advanced-stage tumours (62.1% vs 53.3%, 49.0%, p < 0.01) and were more likely receiving systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) at COVID-19 diagnosis (54.9% vs 43.9%, 39.6%, p < 0.01). Proportions of fully vaccinated/boosted pts were higher in the Omicron phase (33.9%-48.1%) compared to the Alpha-Delta phase (16.6%-2.3%, p < 0.01). Pts diagnosed in the Omicron phase had improved CFR14 (9.0% vs 13.9%, 23.1%, p < 0.01) lower hospitalization rates due to COVID-19 (24.4% vs 41.4%, 56.6%, p < 0.01), lower complications rates (15.3% vs 33.6%, 39.4%, p < 0.01) and reduced need for COVID-19 specific therapy (22.4% vs 43.0%, 65.7% p < 0.01) compared to the Alpha-Delta and pre-vaccinal phase. After adjusting for country of origin, sex, age, comorbidities, tumour stage, status and receipt of SACT at COVID-19, patients diagnosed in the Omicron phase displayed the lowest risk of death at 14 days compared to earlier phases. Similarly, rates of hospitalization and complicated COVID-19 were lowest for Omicron phase. Conclusions: This is the first study to portray the evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron outbreak in Europe, documenting an improvement in all COVID-19 outcomes compared to earlier phases of the pandemic. Enhanced healthcare capacity, improved disease management, immunization campaigns alongside differential virulence of viral strains are likely contributing to improved outcomes across phases.

Attention-based clinical note summarization

In recent years, the trend of deploying digital systems in numerous industries has hiked. The health sector has observed an extensive adoption of digital systems and services that generate significant medical records. Electronic health records contain valuable information for prospective and retrospective analysis that is often not entirely exploited because of the complicated dense information storage. The crude purpose of condensing health records is to select the information that holds most characteristics of the original documents based on a reported disease. These summaries may boost diagnosis and save a doctor's time during a saturated workload situation like the COVID-19 pandemic. In this paper, we are applying a multi-head attention-based mechanism to perform extractive summarization of meaningful phrases on clinical notes. Our method finds major sentences for a summary by correlating tokens, segments, and positional embeddings of sentences in a clinical note. The model outputs attention scores that are statistically transformed to extract critical phrases for visualization on the heat-mapping tool and for human use. © 2022 ACM.

The acute phase response identifies cancer patients with adverse outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection as quantified by the OnCovid Inflammatory Score

We sought to determine parameters of the acute phase response, a feature of innate immunity activated by infectious noxae and cancer, deranged by Covid-19 and establish oncological indices' prognostic potential for patients with concomitant cancer and Covid-19. Between 27/02 and 23/06/2020, OnCovid retrospectively accrued 1,318 consecutive referrals of patients with cancer and Covid-19 aged 18 from the U.K., Spain, Italy, Belgium, and Germany. Patients with myeloma, leukemia, or insufficient data were excluded. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), and prognostic index (PI) were evaluated for their prognostic potential, with the NLR, PLR, and PNI risk stratifications dichotomized around median values and the pre-established risk categorizations from literature utilized for the mGPS and PI. 1,071 eligible patients were randomly assorted into a training set (TS, n=529) and validation set (VS, n=542) matched for age (67.9±13.3 TS, 68.5±13.5 VS), presence of 1 comorbidity (52.1% TS, 49.8% VS), development of 1 Covid-19 complication (27% TS, 25.9% VS), and active malignancy at Covid-19 diagnosis (66.7% TS, 61.6% VS). Among all 1,071 patients, deceased patients tended to categorize into poor risk groups for the NLR, PNI, mGPS, and PI (P<0.0001) with a return to pre-Covid-19 diagnosis NLR, PNI, and mGPS categorizations following recovery (P<0.01). In the TS, higher mortality rates were associated with NLR>6 (44.6% vs 28%, P<0.0001), PNI<40 (46.6% vs 20.9%, P<0.0001), mGPS (50.6% for mGPS2 vs 30.4% and 11.4% for mGPS1 and 0, P<0.0001), and PI (50% for PI2 vs 40% for PI1 and 9.1% for PI0, P<0.0001). Findings were confirmed in the VS (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Patients in poor risk categories had shorter median overall survival [OS], (NLR>6 30 days 95%CI 1-63, PNI<40 23 days 95%CI 10-35, mGPS2 20 days 95%CI 8-32, PI2 23 days 95%CI 1-56) compared to patients in good risk categories, for whom median OS was not reached (P<0.001 for all comparisons). The PLR was not associated with survival. Analyses of survival in the VS confirmed the NLR (P<0.0001), PNI (P<0.0001), PI (P<0.01), and mGPS (P<0.001) as predictors of survival. In a multivariable Cox regression model including all inflammatory indices and pre-established prognostic factors for severe Covid-19 including sex, age, comorbid burden, malignancy status, and receipt of anti-cancer therapy at Covid-19 diagnosis, the PNI was the only factor to emerge with a significant hazard ratio [HR] in both TS and VS analysis (TS HR 1.97, 95%CI 1.19-3.26, P=0.008;VS HR 2.48, 95%CI 1.47- 4.20, P=0.001). We conclude that systemic inflammation drives mortality from Covid-19 through hypoalbuminemia and lymphocytopenia as measured by the PNI and propose the PNI as the OnCovid Inflammatory Score (OIS) in this context.

Macrophage activation syndrome in COVID-19

The novel coronavirus epidemic is characterized by high rates of morbidity and relatively high mortality. Laboratory test results in patients include leukopenia, an increase in liver function tests and ferritin levels reaching hundreds, and sometimes thousands of units. These data remind us about the macrophage activation syndrome (MAC). Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis syndrome, MAC, which pathogenesis is based on a defect in the mechanisms of T-cell cytotoxicity and decreased level of natural killer cells associated with the defect in the perforin-encoding gene as well as hyperproduction of a number of cytokines - interleukin (IL)-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α, etc. by T-lymphocytes and histiocytes, indirectly leading to the activation of macrophages and production of proinflammatory cytokines, in particular IL-6 hyperproduction. MAC is one of "hyperferritinemic syndromes". These disorders have similar clinical and laboratory manifestations, and they also respond to similar treatments, suggesting that hyperferritinemia may be involved in the overall pathogenesis and is characterized by elevated ferritin level and cytokine storm. Despite the fact that data on the immune and inflammatory status in patients with COVID-19 have only started to appear, it is already clear that hyperinflammation and coagulopathy affect the disease severity and increase the risk of death in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Hence, understanding the pathogenesis of the novel coronavirus infection can help in its early diagnostics and treatment.

Features of nervous system damage in antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune process that increases the risk of arterial and venous thrombosis. The mechanism of damage to the central nervous system (CNS) can be not only due to thrombosis, but also antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) circulating in the peripheral blood. The latter can damage the cerebral vascular endothelium, alter the resistance of the blood-brain barrier and penetrate into the central nervous system, exerting a damaging effect on astroglia and neurons, as evidenced by the release of neurospecific proteins into the peripheral bloodstream. The role of APS in developing cerebral ischemia, migraine, epilepsy, chorea, transverse myelitis, multiple sclerosis, cognitive impairment and mental disorders, as well as the peripheral nervous system is described. It should also be noted about a role of APS for emerging neurological disorders in COVID-19, enabled apart from thrombogenesis due to APA via 2 potential mechanisms - molecular mimicry and neoepitope formation. Further study of the APS pathogenesis and interdisciplinary interaction are necessary to develop effective methods for patient management.

Neutrophil extracellular traps: A role in inflammation and dysregulated hemostasis as well as in patients with COVID-19 and severe obstetric pathology

Numerous studies have proven a close relationship between inflammatory diseases and the state of hypercoagulability. In fact, thromboembolic complications represent one of the main causes of disability and mortality in acute and chronic inflammatory diseases, cancer and obstetric complications. Despite this, the processes of hemostasis and immune responses have long been considered separately;currently, work is underway to identify the molecular basis for a relationship between such systems. It has been identified that various pro-inflammatory stimuli are capable of triggering a coagulation cascade, which in turn modulates inflammatory responses. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are the networks of histones of extracellular DNA generated by neutrophils in response to inflammatory stimuli. The hemostasis is activated against infection in order to minimize the spread of infection and, if possible, inactivate the infectious agent. Another molecular network is based on fibrin. Over the last 10 years, there has been accumulated a whole body of evidence that NETs and fibrin are able to form a united network within a thrombus, stabilizing each other. Similarities and molecular cross-reactions are also present in the processes of fibrinolysis and lysis of NETs. Both NETs and von Willebrand factor (vWF) are involved in thrombosis as well as inflammation. During the development of these conditions, a series of events occurs in the microvascular network, including endothelial activation, NETs formation, vWF secretion, adhesion, aggregation, and activation of blood cells. The activity of vWF multimers is regulated by the specific metalloproteinase ADAMTS-13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13). Studies have shown that interactions between NETs and vWF can lead to arterial and venous thrombosis and inflammation. In addition, the contents released from activated neutrophils or NETs result in decreased ADAMTS-13 activity, which can occur in both thrombotic microangiopathies and acute ischemic stroke. Recently, NETs have been envisioned as a cause of endothelial damage and immunothrombosis in COVID-19. In addition, vWF and ADAMTS-13 levels predict COVID-19 mortality. In this review, we summarize the biological characteristics and interactions of NETs, vWF, and ADAMTS-13, the effect of NETs on hemostasis regulation and discuss their role in thrombotic conditions, sepsis, COVID-19, and obstetric complications.

Time-dependent improvement in the clinical outcomes from COVID-19 in cancer patients: An updated analysis of the OnCovid registry

Background: Early reports from registry studies demonstrated high vulnerability of cancer patients from COVID-19, with case-fatality rates (CFR) >30% at the onset of the pandemic. With advances in disease management and increased testing capacity, the lethality of COVID-19 in cancer patients may have improved over time. Methods: The OnCovid registry lists European cancer patients consecutively diagnosed with COVID-19 in 35 centres from Jan 2020 to Feb 2021. We analysed clinical characteristics and outcomes stratified in 5 trimesters (Jan-Mar, Apr-Jun, Jul-Sep, Oct-Dec 2020 and Jan-Feb 2021) and studied predictors of mortality across 2 semesters (Jan-Jun 2020 and Jul 2020-Feb 2021). Results: At data cut-off, the 2634 eligible patients demonstrated significant time-dependant improvement in 14-days CFR with trimestral estimates of 29.8%, 20.3%, 12.5%, 17.2% and 14.5% (p<0.0001). Compared to the 2nd semester, patients diagnosed in the Jan-Jun 2020 time period were ≥65 (60.3% vs 56.1%, p=0.031) had ≥2 comorbidities (48.8% vs 42.4%, p=0.001) and non-advanced tumours (46.4% vs 56.1%, p<0.001). COVID-19 was more likely to be complicated in Jan-Jun 2020 (45.4% vs 33.9%, p<0.001), requiring hospitalization (59.8% vs 42.1%, p<0.001) and anti-COVID-19 therapy (61.7% vs 49.7%, p<0.001). The 14-days CFR for the 1st and 2nd semester was 25.6% vs 16.2% (p<0.0001), respectively. After adjusting for gender, age, comorbidities, tumour features, COVID-19 and anti-cancer therapy and COVID-19 complications, patients diagnosed in the 1st semester had an increased risk of death at 14 days (HR 1.68 [95%CI: 1.35-2.09]), but not at 3 months (HR 1.10 [95%CI: 0.94-1.29]) compared to those from the 2nd semester. Conclusions: We report a time-dependent improvement in the mortality from COVID-19 in European cancer patients. This may be explained by expanding testing capacity, improved healthcare resources and dynamic changes in community transmission over time. These findings are informative for clinical practice and policy making in the context of an unresolved pandemic. Clinical trial identification: NCT04393974. Legal entity responsible for the study: Imperial College London. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: D.J. Pinato: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: ViiV Healthcare;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Bayer;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: EISAI;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Prevalence and impact of COVID-19 sequelae on treatment pathways and survival of cancer patients who recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection

Background: The long-term impact of COVID-19 in cancer patients (pts) is undefined. Methods: Among 2795 consecutive pts with COVID-19 and cancer registered to OnCovid between 01/2020 and 02/2021, we examined clinical outcomes of pts reassessed post COVID-19 recovery. Results: Among 1557 COVID-19 survivors, 234 (15%) reported sequelae including respiratory symptoms (49.6%), fatigue (41%) and cognitive/psychological dysfunction (4.3%). Persisting COVID-19 sequelae were more likely found in males (p=0.0407) aged ≥65 years (p=0.0489) with ≥2 comorbidities (p=0.0006) and positive smoking history (p=0.0004). Sequelae were associated with history of prior hospitalisation (p<0.0001), complicated disease (p<0.0001) and COVID-19 therapy (p=0.0002). With a median post-COVID-19 follow up of 128 days (95%CI 113-148), multivariable analysis of survival revealed COVID-19 sequelae to be associated with an increased risk of death (HR 1.76, 95%CI 1.16-2.66) after adjusting for sex, age, comorbidities, tumour characteristics, anticancer therapy and COVID-19 severity. Out of 473 patients who were on systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) at COVID-19 diagnosis;62 (13.1%) permanently discontinued therapy and 75 (15.8%) received SACT adjustments, respectively. Discontinuations were due to worsening performance status (45.1%), disease progression (16.1%) and residual organ disfunction (6.3%). SACT adjustments were pursued to avoid hospital attendance (40%), prevent immunosuppression (57.3%) or adverse events (20.3%). Multivariable analyses showed permanent discontinuation to be associated with an increased risk of death (HR 4.2, 95%CI: 1.62-10.7), whereas SACT adjustments did not adversely affect survival. Conclusions: Sequelae post-COVID-19 affect up to 15% of patients with cancer and adversely influence survival and oncological outcomes after recovery. SACT adjustments can be safely pursued to preserve oncological outcomes in patients who remain eligible to treatment. Clinical trial identification: NCT04393974. Legal entity responsible for the study: Imperial College London. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: A. Cortellini: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Astellas;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Sun Pharma. D.J. Pinato: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: ViiV Healthcare;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bayer;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Eisai;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

The effect of various types of anticoagulant therapy on the reduction of mortality in COVID-19

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a viral infection that, in severe course, leads to the development of a cytokine storm, systemic inflammatory response and coagulopathy. Unlike other sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, COVID-19 induced coagulopathy is realized mainly in thrombosis. Researchers around the world are currently developing adequate diagnostic, monitoring and anticoagulant therapy approaches to safely and effectively manage patients with severe COVID-19. The need to develop laboratory monitoring is due to the fact that 20% of patients have changes in hemostasis indicators, while in patients with a severe form of the disease, they are present in 100% of cases. In case of deaths from COVID-19, there is an increase in the concentration of D-dimer and fibrinogen degradation products. Thus, the severity of hemostasis disorders has an important prognostic value. Anticoagulant therapy is included in the list of all recommendations as an effective means of reducing mortality from COVID-19. The questions of the recommended groups and doses of anticoagulant drugs are still open. The approach to the choice of an anticoagulant should be based not only on risk factors, characteristics of the course of the disease, anamnesis, but also on the wishes of the patient during long-term therapy at the post-hospital stage.